Why might an employer allow work to be performed in an energized state?

The correct rationale for allowing work to be performed in an energized state is to avoid introducing additional hazards. In some circumstances, deenergizing equipment can create its own set of risks, such as exposure to hazardous energy during the shutdown process or additional hazards that could arise when power is removed.

For instance, in certain industrial setups, turning off equipment may expose employees to mechanical hazards or create other risks linked to the lack of power, such as failure of a critical safety system. By keeping equipment energized, employers can potentially minimize these risks, always taking into consideration proper safety measures, such as personal protective equipment (PPE), to safeguard workers from electrical hazards.

This choice emphasizes the importance of a comprehensive risk assessment in determining the safest operational methods while recognizing that the goal of safety is not just to eliminate electrical hazards but also to manage overall workplace risks effectively. Thus, the decision is informed by a broader perspective of workplace safety rather than focusing solely on electrical safety.