True or False: If the incident energy for an actual arc-flash event exceeds the calculated energy, the Electrical Worker may not have sufficient PPE.

The assertion is true because it highlights the importance of accurately assessing incident energy levels associated with arc-flash events. In the context of electrical safety, the incident energy level is a critical factor that determines the type of personal protective equipment (PPE) required for workers. If the actual incident energy of an arc-flash event exceeds the calculated energy, it indicates that the conditions present are more hazardous than anticipated.

This discrepancy suggests that the protective measures in place, including the PPE worn by the electrical worker, may not provide adequate protection against the higher energy levels. Therefore, if workers are equipped based only on prior calculations without considering the possibility of increased incident energy during an event, they are potentially exposed to serious safety risks. This emphasizes the necessity for ongoing assessments and the need for workers to use PPE that aligns with the highest potential energy exposure identified in their risk assessments, rather than solely relying on previous calculations.